Cheney Gets Rapped by Another VP
Very interesting article in the Washington Post, Answering to No One, by Walter Mondale (Jimmy Carter's VP). He gives a history of the role of the vice president, and then comes to Dick Cheney. His words affirm what I've felt for a long time.
Cheney set out to create a largely independent power center in the office of the vice president. His was an unprecedented attempt not only to shape administration policy but, alarmingly, to limit the policy options sent to the president. It is essential that a president know all the relevant facts and viable options before making decisions, yet Cheney has discarded the "honest broker" role he played as President Gerald Ford's chief of staff....Through his vast government experience, through the friends he had been able to place in key positions and through his considerable political skills, he has been increasingly able to determine the answers to questions put to the president - because he has been able to determine the questions....
I've never seen a former member of the House of Representatives demonstrate such contempt for Congress -- even when it was controlled by his own party. His insistence on invoking executive privilege to block virtually every congressional request for information has been stupefying - it's almost as if he denies the legitimacy of an equal branch of government. Nor does he exhibit much respect for public opinion, which amounts to indifference toward being held accountable by the people who elected him.
Whatever authority a vice president has is derived from the president under whom he serves. There are no powers inherent in the office; they must be delegated by the president. Somehow, not only has Cheney been given vast authority by President Bush - including, apparently, the entire intelligence portfolio - but he also pursues his own agenda. The real question is why the president allows this to happen.
| Pokes Frontpage |
| About This Blog |
| 50 Things About Me |
| Blogs I Like |
| Greatest Hits |
| Steve's Stuff |
| Contact Me |
| RandomPokes.com |
| SteveDennie.com |
| Anchor Church |
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
Note: No comment for or against Cheney or Mondale is intended or implied by my following comments.
Quote: Nor does he exhibit much respect for public opinion, which amounts to indifference toward being held accountable by the people who elected him.
Public opinion does not equate accountability to the people who elect. There is no such thing as "public opinion". Rather there is reported public opinion. The report depends on what demographic is surveyed, and often the opinion lack factual basis, but rather has been shaped by so-called "public opinion makers". Given the "lemmingness" of society, the above statement advocates elected officials be held accountable to the opinion shapers.
I advocate elected officials be held accountable to the constitution and the laws based upon it. That is the core of a constitutional republic and the rule of law.
Whatever authority a vice president has is derived from the president under whom he serves. There are no powers inherent in the office; they must be delegated by the president.
This is only partially true. The office and authority of Vice-President is not derived solely from the President. It is first derived from the Constitution. Only then, can other authority be added to it as a President delegates.
Somehow, not only has Cheney been given vast authority by President Bush - including, apparently, the entire intelligence portfolio - but he also pursues his own agenda. The real question is why the president allows this to happen.
Didn't the author just essentially say that, in his opinion, the authority of the VP is delegated at the President's pleasure? The logical conclusion of that position would then be that VP Cheney is not pursuing his own agenda, usurping power, or manipulating the president, but that rather, the President has delegate that authority and is comfortable with the VP exercising it.